Dear World: “Our House in [Name of City] Will Be Vacant Indefinitely While We’re Hunkered Down in [Remote Town]”

WSJ: “Wealthy City Dwellers Seek Refuge From Coronavirus at Remote Ranches”

[Note to Readers:  The views expressed here are solely those of Ross Kaplan, and do not represent Edina Realty, Berkshire Hathaway (“Berkshire”), or any other entity referenced. Edina Realty is a subsidiary of Berkshire.]

Three things perplex me about oblivious rich people who agree to be interviewed, on the record, for stories about oblivious rich people who are fleeing their primary homes and cities for the perceived safety of their 2nd (4th? 6th??) homes in remote areas.

Namely: 1) why flaunt your wealth so publicly?; 2) why create an undue security risk at your primary residence by announcing your absence?; and 3) why raise your profile with your new, temporary neighbors, who may resent your presence — and any coronavirus exposure you may be bringing with you?

While I’ve occasionally written travel-related posts on this blog, I make a point to NEVER do that — or allude to being out-of-town on Facebook or other social media — while I’m gone.

Bragging Rights??

Yeah, Yeah, I’m sure the (presumably opulent) primary homes of the ultra-affluent are protected by the latest electronic security, are located inside patrolled, gated communities, etc., etc.

Too, at least a few such wealthy people probably assume that rural hicks don’t read The Wall Street Journal. 

But, still.

As a non-rich, long-time Minnesotan, I’m gratified to report that I’ve yet to see someone local profiled in any of these rather obnoxious stories.

And, it’s not because there aren’t (very) wealthy people here . . .

P.S.: I’m even prouder of Minnesota’s success, so far, limiting the spread of Covid-19.

No doubt that’s a testament to both the state’s forward-thinking political leaders, and its civic-minded populace.

from RSSMix.com Mix ID 8230700 https://ift.tt/2VbZLo5
via IFTTT