“Splitting the Difference” & Other Negotiating Tactics

Real Estate Negotiating Principles

“Whomever speak first [in a negotiation] . . . loses.”

–Anonymous.

“Whomever proposes “splitting the difference” in a negotiation stands to get the better bargain.”

–Corollary, Ross Kaplan.

Veteran negotiators will attest to the truth of the first statement:  if you speak first, you never find out if the other side would have offered/accepted (even) more advantageous terms.

It’s also the case that the more (over)eager party can’t restrain themselves, and gives that away by — yup — talking too much and/or too soon.

But I’ve also found the second principle to be (mostly) true.

The following is an exaggerated, fictional exchange — but serves to illustrate the usual dynamic.

Buyer:  Here’s my written offer of $250k for your $500k (listed) home.
Seller:  Sorry, that won’t work. I’m countering $485k instead.
Buyer:  That’s still too high.  How about we split the difference?

To be sure, there are situations where splitting the difference is an appropriate — and fair — resolution to a negotiating impasse.

But only when the deck isn’t already stacked in favor of one side or the other.

See also, “Negotiating Tips.”



from RSSMix.com Mix ID 8230700 http://bit.ly/2IXr0PO
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“Meticulously Maintained,” Deciphered

Maybe Trump WASN’T Lying When He Said, “I Alone Can Fix It”

“What’s the Highest Point in Hennepin County?”